patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Connecticut Ranked First in Tax Burden

A Bloomberg Report tallies state income, sales, property and inheritance taxes and "awards" Connecticut first place.

 

This week Capitol DisPatch considers a trio of topics: Connecticut’s tax burden, more views on the upcoming special session on jobs, and a call for grant applications for veterans in need.

TAX BURDEN

“Taxes, after all, are dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society,” said President Franklin D. Roosevelt.

“What at first was plunder assumed the softer name of revenue,” said Thomas Paine.

Whether one believes taxes are privilege or plunder, the state’s tax burden is on state legislators’ minds. That’s no surprise since election season arrived and also since the General Assembly will soon meet for a special session on jobs.

State Rep. John Shaban, a Republican representing Easton, Redding and Weston in the 135th House District recently emailed his constituents a Bloomberg report that said Connecticut leads the nation in tax burden.

According to Bloomberg, the state ranks number one in tax burden because of its 5 percent income tax, its 6.35 percent sales tax, its $2,381 property tax per capita and because of the between a 7.2 percent to 16 percent inheritance tax with $2 million exemption.

“The numbers tell the story—Connecticut has the nation's highest tax burden and among the worst job growth rates in the country. Obviously these measures are related. I will continue to work to reverse this destructive trend,” Shaban said.

In addition to the increase sales tax, from 6 percent to 6.35 percent, there was a further 3 percentage-point levy on luxury goods such as expensive cars and boats. The state also collects the third-highest property taxes per capita and is one of 14 states to tax Social Security income, according to the report. 

“We all expect to pay taxes, but we don’t want to see our taxes wasted,” said state Rep. Terrie Wood, a Republican representing Darien and Norwalk in the 141st House District.

Some legislators said the high standard of living in Connecticut comes with higher incomes, and thus higher taxes. 

“Despite Bloomberg saying that CT has the highest tax burden in the nation, Ernst & Young released a report in July showing that Connecticut businesses faced the lowest tax burden in the entire country,” said state Rep. James Albis, a Democrat representing East Haven in the 99th House District. 

Albis called the recently passed tax increases unfortunate but necessary to get Connecticut back on track and better positioned for the future.

Wood says the problem is the sheer size of state government.

“It’s increased all the while there is net job loss across the state. Private employers are where tax revenue comes from, not government,” she said. “It’s incumbent on leadership to change that.” 

According to Connecticut Voices for Children the other issue facing the state is the concentration of income and the continuing high unemployment rate.

State wide unemployment 9.1 percent 2010, up from 4.9 percent in 1990, according to the US Bureau of Labor Statistics. In addition, Connecticut’s median household income, inflation adjusted, $64,031 in 2010, down from $69,606 in 1990. 

State Sen. Kevin Kelley, a Republican representing towns in the 21st Senate District including Shelton, said he wasn’t surprised about Bloomberg’s report.

“You have a governor who passed the largest tax increase in the state’s history. But when you bring it [legislation] back home to the district what you find are more families who are struggling,” Kelley said. “I have a middle class constituency and they’re screaming ‘Uncle.’ And what did the state do for them? They asked for more money. They gave them a larger tax bill.”

EXTREME MAKEOVER?

In less then 10 days the General Assembly will meet for a special session on jobs.

“The jobs session is purely cosmetic,” Wood said. “And it’s ironic that it’s just before the elections.”

Gov. Dannel P. Malloy’s office took issue since a final package has yet to be presented.

“Her leaders are working to try to make this bipartisan and as helpful as possible to businesses; and raising concerns about a date that was chosen in consultation with every legislative leader, including her own,” Colleen Flanagan, spokeswoman for Malloy, said in an email.

Moreover, Flanagan said the governor is focused on job growth. 

“The recent announcement that Jackson Laboratories will be a making a billion dollar investment in Connecticut is proof that the Governor’s focus is producing results,” Flanagan said.  “As we head into the jobs special session, the Governor has been very clear that he wants it to be bipartisan, and he and legislative leaders are working to make that happen.”

CALL TO ACTION FOR VETERANS IN NEED

Two state Senators want local US military veterans in need to know about a new grant offered by the Peter Wojtecki Foundation for Veterans Assistance. It would help pay for rent, mortgage and other expenses for up to one year.

“Far too many of our nation’s military veterans fall on hard times after leaving the service,” saidState Sen. Carlo Leone, Chairman of the General Assembly’s Veteran’s Affair Committee and a Democrat representing Stamford in the 27th Senate District.

State Sen. Bob Duff, a Democrat representing Norwalk and Darien in the 25th Senate Districtalso urged veterans to apply.

To be eligible veterans must live in Darien, New Canaan, Norwalk and Stamford; have encountered a hardship primarily due to no fault of their own; and be drug and alcohol free.  Visit wojtecki.blogspot.com and download the grant application. Or call (203) 359-0169 or (203) 801-0060. The application deadline is Oct. 31st. The grant will be awarded in December.

About this column: Capitol DisPatch examines the issues and bills facing local representatives in the Connecticut General Assembly. Related Topics: Jobs, Taxes, and Veterans

Stan

5:28 pm on Monday, October 17, 2011

Seriously, is anyone surprised? We have the Democrat spenders (and Republican enablers) at the helm, who never met a cause they didn't think the government shouldn't involve (read: spend lots of money) itself in. If one more politician in this state starts talking about how they need to focus on job creation I might vomit. Bigger government = smaller citizens. The two are inversely related. No wonder our unemployment rate is awful. Newsflash to politicians: if you make it harder (i.e., more expensive) for people and businesses to be here they're going to continue to leave and then you'll have to suck more money from a smaller pool of victims. It doesn't take a genius to see where that leads. Finally, are we still in "first" place among the states in debt-per-capita or did Maniac Malloy's tax increases magically solve it? This state didn't have an income tax 20 years ago and we recently decided it was time for an increase. I guess CT wants to be the next California. If the state isn't taxing something into the ground they're going after them via the Attorney General who always claims to be doing things for the regular guy - you know, like harassing the very businesses that employ us. And they say the private sector is greedy.

Reply

Linda Ingmanson

9:00 am on Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Taxes are out of control in this state. We live in a tiny one bathroom, two bedroom house on a slip of land and our property taxes are over $5000 a year. I remember when the income tax was proposed as a "temporary" fix. I'll always consider CT my home, but it's getting to the point where we can't realistically live here anymore.

Reply

Stan

8:30 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

Until enough politicians recognize the problem as one of spending rather than revenue, we'll continue to be at the "top" of this list.

Reply

J Bauer

9:05 am on Thursday, October 20, 2011

It's shocking to me prior to 1992 there was no income tax and the state got along just fine. Now the tax is north of 6% and we still have a massive budget deficit. Things in this state were pretty okay in the 1950s, 1960s, 1970s, 1980s and we did fine without an income tax!! Is the standard of living or quality of life SO much better now that we have taxed our citizens massively for the last 20 years? I don't think so. The question becomes where does all the tax revenue go to then? How could there be so many new expenses and spending projects to absorb so much money and still leave us with a gaping hole to fill?!?! The answer in part is poorly run government and giveaways to public sector unions.

Reply

Tom Doyle

7:40 am on Sunday, October 30, 2011

Amazing we are the most taxed state and taxes continue to increase. The estate tax rate is now 20% which will certainly induce some to find a less greedy place to live. Also the governor has clearly indicated that he would rather tax his way to a balanced budget vs reduce expenses. So the one thing you can be sure of is that that taxes will continue to increase in future years until voters get tired of being the most taxed state in the country.

Reply

Leave a comment