.
Feedback

100 Years Ago, 100 Babies Born in New Canaan

In 2012, New Canaan saw just one home birth, officials say—nationwide, data shows that home births are increasing.

 

One-hundred years ago, exactly 100 babies were born in New Canaan—physically, right here in town—officials say.

We shouldn’t expect to reach that 1913 figure again, as New Canaan is flanked by two cities with hospitals—in Norwalk and Stamford—and Greenwich Hospital also draws expecting parents.

In fact, last year, just one baby was born in town, the Town Clerk’s office says, and just eight babies have been born in New Canaan since 2001.

“It’s a rare occurrence to have a home birth,” Town Clerk Claudia Weber told Patch.

Here’s a breakdown of home births—and some other vital statistics information—supplied by the town:

 

Year Total Births* Home Births Civil Unions Marriages Deaths 2012

121

1** 0 99 112 2011 162 1 0 130 128 2010 131 0 0 189 127 2009 125 1 1 149 101 2008 153 2 1 83 119 2007 150 1 0 93 121 2006 171 0 1 109 112 2005 160 0 1 126 129 2004 187 0 0 112 116 2003 190 1 0 124 127 2002 194 0 0 118 108 2001 189 1 0 146 131 *Total newborns registered with town, including home births  **An estimate

According to Weber, three of the home-birthed babies in the late 2000s were born to the same New Canaan family.

So it's a trend that may not appear to be catching on here. However, federal officials say, increasing numbers of women nationwide are having their babies at home.

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, nearly all U.S. births occurred outside of a hospital one century ago, “the vast majority of which occurred at home.”

The figure declined, to 44 percent by 1940, and 1 percent by 1969.

However, after a dip from 1990 to 2004, the percentage of U.S. births that occurred at home—though still less than 1 percent of all births—itself increased 29 percent from 2004 to 2009 (the last reportable year, nationally), according to the CDC.

Here are some other key takeaways from a very interesting CDC report that we’ve attached here as a PDF:

  • As a percentage of all births, home births generally are higher in the northwestern states and lower in southeastern states;
  • Midwives attend most home births (62 percent in 2009);
  • Home births are more common with older, married women who have previous children than others.

Why the national trend? According to the CDC report: “Women may prefer a home birth over a hospital birth for a variety of reasons, including a desire for a low-intervention birth in a familiar environment surrounded by family and friends, and cultural or religious concerns.”

[Author’s Note: A New Canaan resident asked me a while back “Who was the last baby born right here in New Canaan?” That sounded interesting so I did a little digging, curious about how many home births we have in town. The Town Clerk and support staff were kind enough to give me what information they lawfully could, so that’s what you see here. Got something you’d like New Canaan Patch to look into? Email newcanaan@patch.com and we’ll see what we can do, and be sure to drop by when we hold our next Office Hours in town.]

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Michael Dinan (Editor) February 11, 2013 at 03:53 pm
One interesting note here is that, in talking about this story with First Selectman Rob Mallozzi, I came to find out that his own mother who is in her early-70s was born at home in Greenwich. I couldn't figure out a way to work that into the article but I thought that was interesting. -Mike
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Porter Gladstone III June 19, 2013 at 06:27 pm
I guess people can organize discussions with agenda as they see fit? Just checked some NRARead More sponsored meetings and this was the sample of speakers:attendees joined in honoring Friends of NRA Volunteers of the Year from across with country. Attendees also listened to speakers from the event's sponsors Cabela's, U.S. Law Shield and Universal Coin and Bullion. Former NRA President David Keene encouraged NRA members to stand and fight for their American freedoms, and R. Lee Ermy "The Gunny" reinforced the message by surprising guests and autographing a Glock pistol for one winner. Now unless "the gunny" was the invited person who spoke on behalf of gun control, I cant find the parrallel you demand be accomodated for this groups agenda.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!