.
Feedback

Dog Attack Sparks Discussion on Efficacy of Invisible Fences

Though industry data says invisible fences are 99.5 percent effective, some local dog owners say they don't view the invisible fence as a standalone, foolproof product.

 

New Canaan and area invisible fence users say they view the barriers as deterrents to dogs running off-property rather than absolute prevention measures in and of themselves.

“It works. It’s not foolproof,” New Canaan resident Karla Walsh said on a recent morning as she exited Spencer’s Run at Waveny with her 18-month-old German shepherd dog, Harley. She was joined by Darien residents Marty Hendrickson (with 1-year-old golden retriever, Charlie) and Jennie Foresta (with 2-year-old Bernese mountain dog, Bella).

The dog owners said it’s a good idea to bolster the invisible fence with real fences in yards back up to open space in order to keep out wildlife that potentially could compel a canine to breach the barrier.

Hendrickson said she never leaves her dog unattended outside with just the invisible fence.

“It’s a deterrent,” Foresta said.

The comments follow a widely discussed incident from two weeks ago, when a pair of dogs on a property that’d had an invisible fence installed got out and mauled a neighbor’s miniature donkey. The dogs’ owner was bitten by the donkey as she pulled her dogs off. The company that installed the invisible fence said the system was known to have been down for days prior to the attack.

That incident prompted emotionally charged discussion, ranging from well-wishes for the donkey and woman to outrage at dog owners and Patch readers’ relative fellow-feeling for the human versus the animals involved.

One topic that several account-holders addressed is the efficacy of invisible fences themselves. Representatives from invisible fence companies describe the fences as 99.5 percent effective, with the marginal failure rate due to failure to replace batteries and wire breaks such as through landscaping work.

Dog bites are not rare in New Canaan and happen for all kinds of reasons. Office Mary Ann Kleinschmitt of the New Canaan Police Department’s animal control unit told Patch one benefit of invisible fences is that they tend to keep dogs on property when the dogs get out of the house by mistake—such as when landscapers or other workers open up garage doors to get equipment, for example.

Here are snippets of what some users said about invisible fences:

  • C. Hickey: Any dog above 1ft tall should NOT be allowed an electric fence. Anyone who has a dog, especially a bigger one, knows the electric fence is a poor defense in keeping a dog on your property (and as people never realize, it doesn't prevent other animals from entering your property and possibly attacking.) Isn't this New Canaan? I thought people had money to afford fencing...
  • NCFamily: My question would be "were the Huskies wearing their IF collars at the time of the attack and were the batteries fresh?"
  • Four Jacks: Dogs should be on leashes or behind fences at all times. I'm so tired of hearing "oh, he's friendly", while some dog is jumping on me or my kids. Not everyone is a dog lover!
  • Vikki Foley Boyd: If this owner chooses to own farm animals and dogs, it is her responsibility to build adequate fencing to protect her animals.
    E-fences are worthless especially for strong breeds when pain is not a deterrent … An E-fence may work with a Poodle but not dogs who have been bred to endure living in harsh elements whilst mushing for 8 hours.
  • Kelly F: I love all animals, so feel that the fault lies with the dog owner. At the very least, she should be required to put up a secure and substantial "real" fence, and pay for the medical care of the donkey.
  • Baffled Resident: From my observations over the years, e-fences work well … However, the problems occur when: A. The owners don't remember to change the batteries. B. The owners remove the collar to take the dog off the property, and then forget to place it back on the dog.
  • Laura Stabell: I would never trust invisible fence! I have double fencing-front and back are both fenced separately, he is in the back so he cant bark at dogs on the road.This or a strong deer net or 6' wire fence PLUS an electric fence or invisible fence is the only way to go. Luckily he is now old and slowed down but many years of stress AFTER he was attacked by an aggressive male who was walked off leash by a psycho owner. I never let him off leash either (but had same loose dog attack us on the road after).
  • Amy K: There is another problem with invisible fences other than a failed battery or forgetting to put the collar on. Smart persistent dogs will charge the fence line, and once they cross it and the shock ends, they have learned that they just have to move quickly through the zone.
Glen K Dunbar February 5, 2013 at 11:02 pm
Again, wish I could get FREE dog training. NOT telling me what to do BUT do it for me as I deserve. Show MY WIFE and remind her to walk dogs (after they are trained)
How to put on collar? Where the license tags go if I can find them and figure out what years are what?? SOOO MUCH WORK ON MY PLATAE !! Ummm UNFAIR. How to put on harness? How to attach leash to harness? Which lease for which dog? How to bring dogs out like EVERYONE else is allowed to do but me it seems. How to show my dogs I love them and need them and to be nice to people they encounter so I not get in trouble.
Glen K Dunbar February 5, 2013 at 11:03 pm
what a town !!! what a state !!!!
Bar Dumbglen February 6, 2013 at 02:28 am
If glen was my dog I'd put a muzzle on it
Glen K Dunbar February 6, 2013 at 01:33 pm
Oh Vicki. I feel so sad and hopeless today
Jesse Rosenschein February 6, 2013 at 02:48 pm
With proper training, maintenance and battery care, Invisible Fences actually work for all breeds. They even work well for cats! However, every pet is unique so it is important to have a proper evaluation done by a pet consultant to determine that your dog or cat is a good candidate for training on this type of electronic fence. A good pet containment company that truly cares about the safety and well-being of your pet will offer the initial evaluation at no cost. Here is a local one: http://www.caninecompany.com/cfc/bookSalesAppt.aspx

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Really, why even have a tab called "news"' it's all fluff for the mat part.
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Most part.
Elmcrest June 7, 2013 at 11:50 pm
Well, Patch does have this going for it: hundreds of semi-literate spam phishing posts per hourRead More about televised international soccer matches from multiple fake posters. Hundreds! Reading Patch is like walking through the ruins of a once thriving metropolis.