.
Feedback

Honda Cars Top List of Most Stolen in State

Older model foreign brands top the list of the state's most stolen vehicles in the latest "Hot Wheels" report.

 

The most popular vehicle among auto thieves in Connecticut for 2011 was the 1997 Honda Accord, followed by the 1998 Honda Civic, according to the latest report on vehicle thefts in this state by the National Insurance Crime Bureau.

Each year, the agency reviews auto theft records from police departments around the country to produce its national and state lists, called "Hot Wheels," of the 10 most-stolen vehicles. The report seems to confirm what local police already know .

In its national list, the bureau found that the top three most popular cars among auto theives in 2011 were the 1994 Honda Accord, the 1998 Honda Civic and the full-size  2006 Ford pickup. 

The top 10 most stolen vehicles nationally in 2011 were evenly split among foreign brands and domestic. The most popular models among the domestic brands were Ford, Dodge and Chevrolet.

In Connecticut, seven of the top 10 most popular vehicles among auto thieves were foreign brands and three were domestic.

The good news, according to the “Hot Wheels” report, is that vehicle thefts in 2011 were once again on the decline. “Preliminary 2011 FBI crime statistics indicate a 3.3 percent reduction from the 737,142 thefts recorded in 2010. Vehicle thefts have not been this low since 1967,” the agency said in a press release.

“While overall thefts continue to decline, we are seeing a trend toward increases in the thefts of late model vehicles − ones that are theoretically harder to steal due to sophisticated key code technology,”  NICB President and CEO Joe Wehrle said in the release. “Today’s vehicle thieves are typically professional criminals who have figured out how to get the key code for a specific vehicle, have a replacement key made, and steal the vehicle within a matter of days.”

The Top 10 most stolen vehicles in Connecticut in 2011, according to the "Hot Wheels" report:

 

Rank Vehicle Year 1. Honda Accord 1997 2. Honda Civic 1998 3. Acura Integra 1995 4. Nissan Maxima 1998 5. Toyota Camry 1999 6. Dodge Caravan 1999 7. Nissan Altima 2005 8. Toyota Corolla 1996 9. Ford Pickup (Full Size) 1997 10. Jeep Grand Cherokee 2000
S Tadik August 22, 2012 at 08:02 pm
The 98 Accord and later have better security packages. Get a wheel lock and always lock your car.
Stan August 22, 2012 at 09:53 pm
Of course there are going to be a lot of Accords/Camrys/F-150s stolen because they make so many of them. Wouldn't a more useful figure reflect the rate at which certain vehicles are stolen? What would be more helpful would be the number stolen divided by the number produced/sold rather than the absolute number stolen. (E.g., .125% of '96 Accords are stolen every year).
Glen K Dunbar August 23, 2012 at 12:19 am
Honda is the best car around anywhere. Others are very good. I will say that. But, it is always a Honda that Glen will get. I'd rather walk than not have a NEW Honda.
Esprit de Corps August 23, 2012 at 01:45 am
Excuse me, Mr. Stan but for the sake of accomodation, let's agree that 125% of '96 Accords are stolen in a particular year. My problem is how you can steal any '96 Accords in the following year if you took 125% the previous year. Please excuse my understanding of English. I am sure I misunderstood.
It is amazing to me that more '96 Hondas are stolen every year than are produced and/or sold. This will be big trouble if it continues, don't you think?

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Porter Gladstone III June 19, 2013 at 06:27 pm
I guess people can organize discussions with agenda as they see fit? Just checked some NRARead More sponsored meetings and this was the sample of speakers:attendees joined in honoring Friends of NRA Volunteers of the Year from across with country. Attendees also listened to speakers from the event's sponsors Cabela's, U.S. Law Shield and Universal Coin and Bullion. Former NRA President David Keene encouraged NRA members to stand and fight for their American freedoms, and R. Lee Ermy "The Gunny" reinforced the message by surprising guests and autographing a Glock pistol for one winner. Now unless "the gunny" was the invited person who spoke on behalf of gun control, I cant find the parrallel you demand be accomodated for this groups agenda.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!