.
Feedback

Jumping to Conclusions in Fairfield County

Can you accurately judge the motivations of others in 5 photos or less?

 

There’s a whole lotta jumping to conclusions going on in Fairfield County.

Lisa Lindley, the once-celebrated girls lacrosse coach at , is accused of during a recent championship match versus . Regional news outlets published photos of the incident, which show Lindley, appearing enraged, lifting herself off the ground and knocking the player backward as other players walk nearby, apparently oblivious.

In another embarrassing public incident, the New Canaan in a highly charged online debate over whether or not the mother of four children should have been arrested for for roughly thirty minutes. While the mother was away, one of the young children wandered into a neighbor’s yard. The neighbors called the police to report the incident, who subsequently arrested the mother..

Viewing the pictures associated with the Lindley event or reading the basic details of the New Canaan arrest, it’s easy to draw fast conclusions. Lisa Lindley should be fired—now!—many Darien Patch readers wrote, because what kind of lunatic puts her hands on a child? And what’s wrong over in New Canaan, where apparently choice one when a kid wanders into your yard is calling the police—instead of simply walking the child back home and offering to babysit?

But truth’s publicity department doesn’t work with the same sense of urgency as the Internet rumor mill or even journalism itself.

In New Canaan, for example, the Patch comment thread later revealed that the neighbor of the arrested mother lived on a pond. The child had wandered over on multiple prior occasions and the neighbors were at wits’ end over the child’s safety, because other children and animals had drowned in there in the past. Suddenly, what was once obvious is now unclear—and in the meantime, the reputations of the arrested mother and the neighbor were in online tatters.

The photos of Lisa Lindley make her look bad. But let’s pretend that the dialogue that accompanies the photos sounds something like this:

HEY! GOALIE! Where’s your head? Where’s my star? WE NEED YOU RIGHT NOW! YOUR TEAM IS DEPENDING ON YOU AND YOU’RE NOT FOCUSING! This is it, your last chance before graduation to show your teammates that you can do your best, AND YOU’RE LETTING YOURSELF AND ME AND YOUR FRIENDS DOWN. Is this how you want to leave Darien, on the coattails of a sad-sack effort? YOU’RE BETTER THAN THAT! REMIND GREENWICH WHY WE’RE THE BEST TEAM IN THIS TOURNAMENT! NOW GET TO WORK!

Suddenly, the photos don’t seem so damning, do they? But those who have played competitive sports at a high level know that these words and the intense way in which they’re delivered are the currency of top coaches around the world.

As a high school athlete in upstate New York, my teammates, coaches and I enjoyed a tremendous amount of success. I can’t recall that our coaches ever touched us as the Lindley photos demonstrate, but they were definitely tough. They pushed our limits physically and forced us to focus and leave our entire effort on the court and field at every game and at every practice and with no excuses—but we loved them for it and cared about winning desperately.

One coach in particular—Coach Cleve, I’m talking to you—expected nothing less than excellence every single day. Her caring and commitment to us and our sport brought us all the way to the state tournament. And I’m certain that every member of that team knew what teamwork was about by the time graduation day came.

Commentary columnists expect and enjoy the debate that comes from the sometimes-incendiary words we write to inform and entertain. But before we jump to conclusions about local news and engage in hurtful, personal online attacks, let us remember that these "debates" chip away not only at reason, but at the communities in which we live. 

Edith Middleton June 6, 2012 at 12:05 pm
Great article! Love it <3
Elmcrest June 6, 2012 at 01:48 pm
Two comments:
(1) Even if your fantasy monologue from the Darien girls' lax coach were true, the coach's point could've been made more effectively without the facemask violation. The best, and most successful, coaches I ever had were even-tempered all the time, so on those rare occasions they raised their voice, you'd know it was significant. But if you yell all the time, I guess you have to physically yank your players' heads around to grab their attention. (2) The New Canaan community did not become "embroiled in a highly-charged debate" about the mom and her kids and the neighbor. A bunch of online posters, many from nowhere near here (thanks, Patch!) did. Most of the NC community understands the situation and feels no need to "weigh in" on something they did not witness.
Glen K Dunbar June 6, 2012 at 03:06 pm
As for the Coach. Not sure if She did get too excited w/the student or not. I was not there. I will say though that if She did She really needs to get a life and worry about the important stuff. These are games where Kids should just have fun and compete w/each other with respect and honor and play focused. But, not let it consume oneself.
As for the Mom. I still say I hope She gives the Judge a polite piece of her mind when She goes to court. As for the Dog thing. IF it was an OLD man.... Ummm. For the Dogs sake I would have just busted the window w/whatever I could grab hold of. The old man should maybe have gotten a lecture instead of being carted away. Glen
Sue June 6, 2012 at 03:36 pm
As for the neighbor..."because other children and animals had drowned in there in the past"...I'm really surprised that the child put in charge did not have the "fear of god" instilled in them regarding the situation across the street. Perhaps he/she was changing a diaper or overwhelmed with another situation...but that certainly is a situation worth extra caution and care. Still not sure exactly what law was broken there as there are many 13 year old babysitters around. Perhaps there is more to the story...
Charlene June 6, 2012 at 04:46 pm
Although I didn't comment on either of those topic threads, I'd rather look at it as people "voicing an opionion" instead of "jumping to conclusions"
Lisa Bigelow June 6, 2012 at 07:22 pm
Thanks to all for reading and commenting. As far as the posters on the NC story goes, take some time and read the first few dozen of the 200+ comments left on the original story. It's fair to say that those commenters are, indeed, local. Voicing an opinion in a rational tone is one thing, but taking the time to look up a neighbor's address and post it online is something else entirely (the Patch editor later took the information down) -- especially considering that the information later turned out incorrect!
NewCanaanVoter June 6, 2012 at 08:32 pm
"Perhaps there is more to the story..."
That's kind of the point.
Elmcrest June 6, 2012 at 10:17 pm
Don't scold us -- we did "take some time" to read the whole stupid thing. Again, it's clear, the New Canaan community did NOT become "embroiled in a highly-charged debate" here. About 60 people commented, most of them only once. There were 20 comments from out of town, from Norwalk to Pennsylvania, from Wilton to Waukesha, WI. Only three people commented in double digits. The main reason this "discussion" kept going was because ONE commenter posted a whopping 63 messages, nearly 30% of the total! I stand by my original assertion that the New Canaan community has not made this unfortunate event as big an issue as you and Patch want it to be (3 articles about it? 4? Come on!). Fact is, most New Canaanites have not become "embroiled" in this; the vast majority of adults in town, numbering in the thousands, understand it's not their business, they don't know the facts and background, and that "commenting" about it on Patch will have absolutely no effect on any outcome.
NCDad June 7, 2012 at 09:25 am
Thanks for the article Lisa, nice to finally read an op piece on this topic from someone who actually "gets" sports.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Porter Gladstone III June 19, 2013 at 06:27 pm
I guess people can organize discussions with agenda as they see fit? Just checked some NRARead More sponsored meetings and this was the sample of speakers:attendees joined in honoring Friends of NRA Volunteers of the Year from across with country. Attendees also listened to speakers from the event's sponsors Cabela's, U.S. Law Shield and Universal Coin and Bullion. Former NRA President David Keene encouraged NRA members to stand and fight for their American freedoms, and R. Lee Ermy "The Gunny" reinforced the message by surprising guests and autographing a Glock pistol for one winner. Now unless "the gunny" was the invited person who spoke on behalf of gun control, I cant find the parrallel you demand be accomodated for this groups agenda.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!