.
Feedback

Tom Cruise, Katie Holmes, Anderson Cooper and the High Price of Privacy

There’s an industry that thrives on celebrity gossip and news—so the need to control and manipulate it grows ever strong, especially when there are secrets those stars want kept in the closet.

 

Does this famously-charismatic, A-list movie star have a pretend ‘beard’ marriage arranged by his rumored-to-be cult of a church? Did his much-younger actress wife leave him in an orchestrated, almost-impossible spy-like mission in order to protect their only child from being brainwashed by members of that church? Is this hip-and-handsome cable news anchor really finally ready to give his audience an explanation on what his sexual orientation is?

The recent explosion in headlines about the disintegrating marriage of boldface names Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes shows just how interested the public is in celebrities who own significant real estate on the pop culture landscape. So too do stars from the world of serious news, like CNN’s Anderson Cooper, inspire curiosity in how they live and who they love. You know, enquiring minds, and all.

Even when the famous names aren’t right there in black and white, they still help the publicity and fame machines. Not-so-blind items like the juicy tidbits above are the bread and butter for tabloid gossip websites and mainstream news outlets because they help sell magazines and get page-clicks galore. The media trade in the currency of celebrity ‘infotainment’ news because it’s highly profitable. Having worked in the entertainment media world, I can attest that the market for inside info and celebrity scoop is only getting hotter and more revelatory.

But just because celebrities make their living based on their power to draw an audience, does that mean they aren’t entitled to have their private lives remain private? Are they beholden to spill their guts, to be completely open and honest with their adoring public just because they work in the public eye?

On the flip side, if their private lives aren’t necessarily in line with their public ‘persona,’ is it okay for celebs to feed us a smorgasbord of lies in order to paint a more flattering—but completely false—picture of their lives?

When news broke last week of the sudden split between Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes (TomKat, R.I.P), I wasn’t the least bit shocked or surprised. Their almost six-year marriage and preceding relationship probably set some Guinness Book record for speculation and gossip. She auditioned for the ‘role’ of his wife! They signed a contract that gives her $3 million a year plus a bonus for having a baby! Suri was conceived with Church of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard’s sperm! It’s an arranged marriage so no one finds out he’s really gay!

Yeah, but if it’s out there in print, well it must be true, right?

Gossip, celebrity, ratings, box office—what it boils down to is money. Movie stars’ images impact their box office power and earning strength, for themselves and for the studios that invest so heavily in them. They’ve all got financial motivation to keep the secrets hidden and the lies afloat.

Not as strong, but just as pervasive, there’s a black-market that trades on rumors, gossip, revelations and insider secrets—a disgruntled employee willing to tell all can earn big bucks for ratting out the famous boss, or a publicist will offer a tidbit on another star if the muckraker keeps her client’s peccadilloes private. Let’s not even start to talk about the rat-pack paparazzi.

One significantly curious factor in the two stories I’m focusing on here is the mention of homosexuality. Both Cruise and Cooper have had the ‘gay rumor’ swirl about them for years. Part of the continued interest in talking about each star is the question of “is he or isn’t he?”

Shortly after news broke of Holmes’ surprise divorce filing, Cooper’s own news story broke when he let it be ‘quietly’ known that, yes, “The Fact is, I’m Gay.”  Actually, I should say that he let it be quietly known, publicly. According to media news circles and writers within the gay community, it’s never really been a secret, just something Cooper never chose to discuss in any interview or publicity he’s ever done. Part of what motivated him now to address it was a desire to correct any “mistaken impression” that he had something to hide or wise ashamed.

Is that the last bastion of titillation—being a closeted gay?  Like Cooper, other celebs who have come out over the last couple of years without fanfare, gasps or repercussions to their careers are doing just fine, thanks. In fact, some of them have benefitted greatly, as I’m sure Ellen DeGeneres would agree.

It’s really only stars that are perceived to be living a life of insincerity and pretend that seem to get damaged with the revelation or what’s alleged to be true. Just Google “John Travolta gay scandal” and you’ll see how paralyzing and career damaging conjecture, innuendo and unsubtle hints can be.

"So how can I tell what’s really true and what isn't?" you ask.

It pays to remember that it’s called the ‘entertainment business’ for a reason:  it exists to tell us stories and keep us entertained. So whether you’re reading a story about the famous couple who fell in love on a movie set or a glossy profile of that plucked-from-the-cornfield starlet that debuted on the movie scene after her big break, just remember that there’s a lot that goes on in the background to make you think what you’re seeing is real.

Because even when the final credits roll, and the movie screen tells you it’s 'The End', the magic never stops.

coachfactory August 15, 2012 at 02:55 am
http://www.louisvuittonhandbag-outlets.org/ Louis Vuitton Handbags Outlet
http://www.getcoachfactoryoutlets.org/ Coach Factory outlet http://www.atcoachoutletsonline.org/ Coach Outlet http://www.saleincoachoutlets.net/ Coach Outlet Online http://www.pradabag-outlet.org/ prada outlet http://www.louisvuittonhandbag-outlets.org/ Louis Vuitton Handbags http://www.getcoachfactoryoutlets.org/ Coach Factory http://www.atcoachoutletsonline.org/ Coach Outlet Online http://www.pradabag-outlet.org/ prada bags http://www.saleincoachoutlets.net/ Coach Outlet

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Really, why even have a tab called "news"' it's all fluff for the mat part.
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Most part.
Elmcrest June 7, 2013 at 11:50 pm
Well, Patch does have this going for it: hundreds of semi-literate spam phishing posts per hourRead More about televised international soccer matches from multiple fake posters. Hundreds! Reading Patch is like walking through the ruins of a once thriving metropolis.