.
Feedback

$2.5 Million Civil Suit Filed against Regans

Citing pain and suffering, survivors of Krishna Jayaraman filed their papers Feb. 23 in connection with the fatal hit-and-run that occurred in August 2010.

The New Canaan woman accused of a town man with her and leaving the scene last summer now faces a $2.5 million from the deceased man's relatives, court documents show.

The family of Krishna Jayaraman, 84, filed its suit Feb. 23 against Kate Regan and her husband Michael Regan, according to papers filed in state Superior Court in Stamford.

In an affidavit that forms part of the law suit, the , also Krishna Jayaraman, said his father “was caused to experience great pain, suffering and emotional trauma,” before his death, and that the family has incurred medical, funeral and burial expenses as a result of the accident.

Jayaraman was struck and killed Aug. 18 as he collected mail outside his son’s home on Oenoke Ridge, where the elder Jayaraman and his wife also lived. Kate Regan has been with negligent homicide and evading responsibility in connection with the incident.

In the complaint, Kate and Michael Regan are both accused of negligence, and Kate Regan is also accused of commiting statutory recklessness and common law recklessness. Michael Regan is named as the owner of the his wife was driving at the time of the accident.

“Kate Regan knew she hit something while traveling on Oenoke Road (sic) in New Canaan on August 18, 2010, but failed to stop,” the victim’s son said in the affidavit attached to the filing. “Instead, she lied at least 3 times as to how the damage to their vehicle occurred.”

The chronology of events in Jayaraman's affidavit matches the one outlined in the that led to Regan’s in November — though it appears to run against the spirit of what Regan's criminal lawyer following her arraignment.

Both affidavits said that after the accident, Regan stopped at a Sunoco Station in Pound Ridge and told an employee there, Daniel Cruz, that her car had been damaged in a parking lot in New Canaan earlier in the day. She offered the same account to a representative from Geico, the Regan family’s insurance company, and to Sgt. Peter Condos, of the , when he contacted her as he conducted his investigation.

According to the papers, Kate Regan was speeding at the time of the impact. The filing says she was “speeding while she took her eyes off the road” to change a DVD and “veered to the far right of the roadway and without warning” struck Jayaraman with the front right side of the Infiniti, “violently throwing (Jayaraman) onto the ground” before driving over him “with the rear tires of her vehicle.”

Regan “did not stop to render assistance,” the document says, leaving Jayaraman “severely injured in his driveway.”

The accident took place at approximately 4:30 p.m. on a clear summer day. According to the affidavit filed with the lawsuit, Jayaraman was pronounced dead at 6:15 p.m. at .

In the affidavit, Jayaraman said the event, which has New Canaan residents, has been devastating to his entire family.

“I have lost my father, and my children have lost their grandfather, with whom we were all very close with as he lived in the cottage on my property with my mother,” Jayaraman said. “My mother lost her life time spouse and caregiver.”

According to the filing, on the day of the accident the Regans were covered by two insurance policies. They held a liability policy from Geico Insurance Co. in the amount of $250,000 and an Uninsured/Underinsured Motorist Policy from Chubb Insurance, with $300,000 coverage.

As a result of the filing, the Regans’ assets, including their home in New Canaan, and all bank, stock and brokerage accounts have been frozen. According to town tax records, the home at 383 Michigan Road was by Michael and Kate Regan for $1.6 million on Sept. 17, 2010.

GoRams March 3, 2011 at 08:02 pm
I sympathize with both families. I also respect our American legal system in which we are all innocent until proven guilty in a court of law.
You also confuse affidavits as "truths." An affidavit is a personal account of what the affiant believes to be the truth. Just because Mr. Krishna's affidavit says that Mrs. Regan's back tire ran over his father does not necessarily mean that is what happened. That is Mr. Krishna's belief as to what happened. Mr. Krishna's affidavit also states that Mrs. Regan "knew" she hit something, which is curious, because how could Mr. Krishna "know" what Mrs. Regan did know or did not know? And a civil complaint is not necessarily the truth. It's a legal document designed to tell a story in a light most favorable to a plaintiffs' ability to recover money from a defendant. I don't mean to attack you and you're certainly entitled to your opinion but I hope that you keep your comments to at least a cordial discourse. Vilifying Mrs. Regan does nothing for this community. It's a sad story. No one knows the "truth" about what happened yet. The justice system will decide the scope of Mrs. Regan's liability and eventually the facts of that day will come out. Until then, it's entirely unhelpful to grandstand here and fuel the fire by ranting or lashing out against Mrs. Regan through hundreds upon hundreds of internet posts.
NC REZ March 3, 2011 at 08:24 pm
Really, Deborah? $2.5 million is a small amount? Most people would have gone for a lot more? How, exactly?
John March 3, 2011 at 08:59 pm
Just a small dent in the trust fund, for sure...
GoRams March 3, 2011 at 09:05 pm
Another useless comment.
John March 3, 2011 at 09:21 pm
Was she on her way to WORK? Don't think so. I do not think she worked after her marriage nor worked to pay a dime of her tuition.
GoRams March 3, 2011 at 09:51 pm
John, you're misinformed. It's been widely reported that she was an elementary school teacher. But even if she was a stay-at-home-mom, are you crticizing her for not "working"? You're totally out of line.
GoRams March 3, 2011 at 09:54 pm
I'm not disputing that she thought she hit something-- i.e. an object, which is why she later stopped. I'm saying that it's pure speculation at this point that she thought she hit a person. There's plenty of facts that show she didn't think she hit a person and that this wasn't a "hit and run" as its been twisted and reported by the press and in these comments.
Ksmithee March 3, 2011 at 11:01 pm
GoRams-The fact that Mr Jayaraman mentioned something in a statement given under oath so specific as the rear tires seems that he knows something more from the investigation or ME's report than the general public knows.
G McEvoy March 3, 2011 at 11:20 pm
i thought that KS commented earlier in the day that we weren't going to hear from him/her anymore on this issue ... but back at it again!
Jennifer March 3, 2011 at 11:23 pm
John, EVERY mother is a working mother.
Jennifer March 3, 2011 at 11:25 pm
I never understand these civil suits. Will the money bring the deceased back? No. A hollow victory if they win.
cooper March 3, 2011 at 11:43 pm
I agree with you Ksmithee - the inclusion of the mention of rear tires may be very telling.
Ksmithee March 4, 2011 at 12:15 am
the modest amount could be an actuary's figure on what the long term psychological cost the family will incur due to the sudden & brutal death of their loved one. The amount could also possibly be based on Mr Jayaraman's wage earnings potential had he not died.
The respectful way the Jayaraman family has conducted themselves over the last 7 months does not reflect a family that wants a "victory" of any kind.
mike March 4, 2011 at 12:59 am
KS and GoRams: why don't you two exchange emails and argue amongst yourselves and leave this blog for other residents
mary parker March 4, 2011 at 03:39 am
I feel the family of the victom is giving the Regans a break in the amount they are going after. They have a right to file a civil suit. I think they are being fair in the amount they are suing for. Most families would go for a lot more. He has a wife left to be alone and she deserves money for her husbands death. He also has grandchildren who will never see him again. Part of that money I bet is for them also. A loved one was taken and whether Regan is guilty or not, she still took a loved one away from a family and owes them something. Why should the family of the victom have to bare the expence of someone elses negligence?
G McEvoy March 4, 2011 at 03:41 am
KS whining about herself yet again ... very tiresome! How about everyone sticking to the topic of the original article ... that would make reading others insightful comments much more interesting.
Ksmithee March 4, 2011 at 04:05 am
I bet all the money in the world could never fill the void that the Jayaraman family is feeling in their life now.... thinking that they are "owed" or "deserving" of any money had probably never
occurred to them.
Suzanne March 4, 2011 at 12:53 pm
Back to kindergarten, all of you, to learn about "everything you need to know." My understanding about this forum is it is a place where everyone is allowed to express their opinions about the issue at hand - not each other.
Has anyone listened to an argument in Congress lately? Everyone is entitled to their opinion, unplesant or not or whether you are tired of hearing/seeing them or not. What is the issue? A woman driving a vehicle hit a person who died, did not stop then lied about hitting anything at all. The deceased's family is suing. Motive? Who knows? Actual facts? Who knows? One can speculate and one can certainly be upset about what values are represented by such actions.
KS March 4, 2011 at 12:59 pm
Agreed Suzanne, well said.
NewCanaanResident March 4, 2011 at 01:27 pm
If I worked at Camp Playland or Michaels Limo advertising departments, I would be very happy with page views on my banner ads. Thats what this is all about!
@jennifer - you go girl - motherhood is work! $2.5 million is good vacation money - sitting at Disney World will ease the pain somewhat for the kids. Might be a good down payment on the Regan house too!!! Talk about payback.
Larry Schaefer March 4, 2011 at 01:44 pm
You are remarkably aggressive on behalf of the accused Mr. NCResident, hiding behind a fake name.
Aurthur Litskevitch March 4, 2011 at 07:21 pm
Agreed.
NewCanaanResident March 4, 2011 at 08:22 pm
Hardly aggressive - just not a fan of lynch-mob mentality.
More of a judicial system believer.
GoRams March 4, 2011 at 09:52 pm
Amen, NewCanaanResident!
Craig March 5, 2011 at 02:45 am
clearly suzanne and paul are extremely well grounded but it apprears we have both sides of the coin streuously represented in this blog ("let her go attend to her babies and effectively forget the victim" and "string her up for lieing, if not more". anyone want to make it interesting and make a bet on the $ amount of the civil settlement, jail time, and probation time. the closest without going over would win the collective pool. for those hard core liberals in the crowd, anyone want to risk it all and bet she gets off scot free criminally and or in the upcoming civil case? alternatively, we could all take a rumplestiltsken nap and wake up after the system, and potentially juries of her peers, render decisions.
Ksmithee March 5, 2011 at 03:16 am
lol...clearly Craig missed the afternoon bus to Mohegan Sun
New Canaan Fan March 7, 2011 at 02:34 pm
Dear All,
I am deeply saddened when I read through the string of comments on this site. This was no doubt a terrible tragedy for all involved. I have lost a close family member myself so I feel the pain of the victim's family. I am also a young mother so I have empathy for Ms. Regan and what she is going through. But please, let's leave the case up to the judicial system. Pointing fingers, speculating, arguing with each other - it all seems like such a waste of time. Let's step away from our computers and invest our time and resources in more worthy pursuits available to all of us in our wonderful town.
ram March 7, 2011 at 11:11 pm
KS and GoRams you need to find something else to do rather than commenting on a news article. Let these two families and the judicial system figure this out on their own. The courts have made it so that biases do not show through in the jury, which is why you are not sitting in the courtroom. Please do not tear either party apart before you read every single piece of evidence.
Charles Debrabent March 8, 2011 at 09:02 pm
Well said. KS and GoRams: Nobody needs to hear your back and forth about the same issues of everytime a new article comes out. In fact here is a concept. Actually disclose your real name and email you can start your own email string with whomever wants to beat dead horses with you.
Ann Khan May 9, 2011 at 11:34 am
reckless driving and imprudent speed is the most common reasons of accident.these drivers should be charged.. reckless driver!! these drivers should be reported we must report them online on www.driver-ratings.com

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Really, why even have a tab called "news"' it's all fluff for the mat part.
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Most part.
Elmcrest June 7, 2013 at 11:50 pm
Well, Patch does have this going for it: hundreds of semi-literate spam phishing posts per hourRead More about televised international soccer matches from multiple fake posters. Hundreds! Reading Patch is like walking through the ruins of a once thriving metropolis.