.
Feedback

Forest St Mixed Use Building Project Update

A public hearing for the retail and residential project planned for 21 Forest Street was closed at the Planning and Zoning meeting Tuesday night.

 

Attorney Bruce Hill, representing Christopher Gatto of Gatto Development, town Attorney Chris Jarboe and Jeff Wyzynski of Tecton Architects, briefed the Tuesday night with the latest developments in the mixed use development planned for Forest Street. 

Wyzynski addressed the issues of lighting in the parking deck, stating that the space would be designed to be warm and inviting with eight skylights, six simulated cove lighting, and 25’ to 30’ LED candles. Lighting along the ceiling and perimeter of covered parking will also be recessed to hide the source of lighting.

Wyzynski also noted that security cameras will be installed in the covered parking area.

At the July Planning and Zoning meeting, the project application included a request for an amendment, which would give the commission authority to to be flexible with building height and squared footage.

“When we first came to you to ask you to address some text amendments to allow for flexibility among building criteria,” said Hill, “those regulations were specific for special permit requirements - that specific language allows us to increase building height only if you make affirmative finding that proposed development will make consistent community development, improves the streetscape and pedestrian experience. I think we have achieved all of them.”

Bill Griffin, owner of 32 Forest, 26 Forest Street and whose father is the owner of 0 Forest Street and 15 Forest Street, was also present and voiced his support of the development.

“I am fully supportive,” said Griffin, “I think we’re on the verge of accomplishing something Christ-Janer dreamed about back in 1988 - having Forest Street as completed street. I want to give you a lot of credit for making this happen. I think this is for the good of New Canaan and Forest Street. I think this is a great project.”

Another aspect of the application details a potential pedestrian walkway from Forest Street to Cherry Street.

The project is still in the application stage and has not received a vote yet.

See the attached PDF for site plans and artistic rendering.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Mimi Findlay August 30, 2012 at 10:58 pm
The little 2-story painted brick building with flat roof and overhanging roof at 21 Forest Street was built between 1867 and 1878, according to the 1987 HIstoric and Architectural Survey of selected buildings downtown: "This three bay flat roofed Italianate building still retains its stucco cornices and rusticated stucco surfaced facade. At the ground floor simple double hung windows flank a simple entry. Above this is an elaborate horizontal cornice, and in the second floor are three 6/6 windows beneath a much larger overhanging deteriorating stucco cornice."
While not preserving this historic building, the new design appears to pay homage with a deep overhanging cornice, while its new windows with arched lintels reflect these on the Silliman building up the street. What an irony that Victor Christ-Janer's vision of a completed Forest Street comes at the exact moment that his own innovative house, one of our Moderns, of 50 plus years is about to be demolished for yet another two McMansions.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Porter Gladstone III June 19, 2013 at 06:27 pm
I guess people can organize discussions with agenda as they see fit? Just checked some NRARead More sponsored meetings and this was the sample of speakers:attendees joined in honoring Friends of NRA Volunteers of the Year from across with country. Attendees also listened to speakers from the event's sponsors Cabela's, U.S. Law Shield and Universal Coin and Bullion. Former NRA President David Keene encouraged NRA members to stand and fight for their American freedoms, and R. Lee Ermy "The Gunny" reinforced the message by surprising guests and autographing a Glock pistol for one winner. Now unless "the gunny" was the invited person who spoke on behalf of gun control, I cant find the parrallel you demand be accomodated for this groups agenda.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!