.
Feedback

Lakeview Ave. Bridge Arbitration Subcommittee Questions New Canaan CFO

Slogging through myriad details, timelines and e-mails to ensure "something like this doesn't happen again."

Getting answers to the Lakeview Ave. bridge arbitration award confusion is akin to a mouse going through a maze to find the cheese. There are dead ends, roadblocks, and things that will just about make your head spin. On Thursday night, in a nearly three-hour meeting at , the Town Council's Lakeview Ave. Bridge Arbitration Subcommittee continued on its fact finding mission. The meeting was attended by a small group of people who were interested in how a nearly $650,000 arbitration award could have "slipped through the cracks," as said this one did.

Gary Conrad, the chief financial officer of New Canaan, was grilled about everything from the town's financial guidelines to specifics about the capital non-recurring fund — from which the award payment was made — to e-mails that shared information about who knew what and when did they know it concerning the payout that . The horse was let out of the barn a long time ago and Walker has already taken responsibility for the error, so why go on what seems like a witch hunt? 

"I think our goal is not so much looking back as it is moving forward," said  and subcommittee member, Beth Jones. "We're working on finding where the glitches were so we make sure something like this doesn't happen again." 

Also at issue during the meeting was the role of the Town Treasurer, a position that's been held by V. Donald Hersam since 1965. Hersam's signature is stamped on town checks. There were questions about where Hersam was when the bills were presented and paid for legal fees and the arbitration award itself.

In addition, questions were raised about which expenses are reimbursable by the state. While construction costs of the bridge incurred by New Canaan are eligible for reimbursement by the state, the legal bills are not, leaving the town on the hook for more than $800,000. 

"I think we are finding out a lot," resident Fred Chang said. "We are getting there step by step, but I'm not completely satisfied with any of their answers, I'm sorry to say." 

That mistakes were made has been acknowledged. How to prevent the similar errors from happening again was the most important thing to the subcommittee members. 

"I think the meeting was very productive," said Town Council member Thomas 0'Dea. "We're getting answers for our residents and that's what our job is. But, obviously, we have to do things better."

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

NCMom July 9, 2011 at 05:45 pm
Has Mr. Dawaele been asked why he took this off the agenda for several months prior to it finally becoming transparent?
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Really, why even have a tab called "news"' it's all fluff for the mat part.
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Most part.
Elmcrest June 7, 2013 at 11:50 pm
Well, Patch does have this going for it: hundreds of semi-literate spam phishing posts per hourRead More about televised international soccer matches from multiple fake posters. Hundreds! Reading Patch is like walking through the ruins of a once thriving metropolis.