.
Feedback

Malloy Talks Jobs, Gender Equality in Stamford

The governor met with both the Fairfield County Business Council and Women's Business Development Council last Wednesday.

 

It was a day of talking business in Stamford when Gov. Dannel P. Malloy swept through Wednesday, making stops at both the Business Council of Fairfield County's winter luncheon and the grand re-opening of the Women’s Business Development Council's office.

The luncheon featured businesses from Fairfield County gathering to discuss the current economic landscape and hear from the top state official about what steps are being taken to help stimulate job creation in Connecticut.

Business Council of Fairfield County Vice President of Public Policy Joe McGee said the luncheon offered business owners in the region a chance to directly connect with the politicians that support them so they can air the issues they face through the channels that will help most.

"It's a chance for business owners, both large and smaller entrepreneurial companies, to propose questions directly to the governor," said McGee. "They get to ask him 'what's happening,' themselves. Is the job market improving? what is the state doing to help create jobs? How is he encouraging Connecticut to grow?"

The governor's two-pronged approach focused on just that. At the luncheon, he said his work over the last two years was simply poising Connecticut to be in a position where it would be able to continue to grow strongly over the long-term, but that there was still a long road ahead of them.

"Economic Development is at the forefront of everything we're doing," Malloy said during his address. "Until every person in Connecticut who's looking for a job, can find a job, our job's not done."

Malloy went onto call Stamford, and Fairfield County at large, a solid building block off which the rest of Connecticut should be taking advantage.

"Yes, some of the... biggest investments that we're making are in this area and I get criticized about that upstate," Malloy said. "But the reality is we have to build on our strengths, and Stamford, in this marketplace, is a strength."

Malloy said his role in stepping up Connecticut's efforts has brought $2 billion in private investment dollars and vastly expanded the business pool for the state, from 200 companies in the previous six years before he took office to 600 companies in which the state has invested, made loans, or interacted in the two years since he took office.

At the Women's Business Development Council, Malloy said women have, for far too long, been a workforce operating in the shadows of their male counterparts, and he was ready to see to it Connecticut was ready to make gender inequalities a thing of the past.

Malloy cited Connecticut having the second-largest pay gap in New England, with women earning only 75.8-percent of their male counterparts, as a driver for a new program he was forming. He said 40-percent of that gap has been shown to amount to nothing other than discrimination.

"Even though we took national steps in the past...we still have a ways to go in our own state," Malloy said. "What I've directed to the Department of Labor—led by a woman—to undertake is our own Connecticut study of this problem and to make recommendations on how we deal with it in the short- and long-run."

The WBDC is a national organization with 110 chapters that helps educate female business owners about the available resources that can help get them established. Fran Pastore, founder and chief executive officer of the Stamford Chapter, is the only WBDC member to have a seat on the National Women's Business Council.

The governor was on hand Wednesday to help the Stamford WBDC open their new Financial Center at 184 Bedford St., which was only accomplished thanks to a $239,000 loan and $100,000 grant from Malloy's Small Business Express program, administered through the Department of Economic and Community Development.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Porter Gladstone III June 19, 2013 at 06:27 pm
I guess people can organize discussions with agenda as they see fit? Just checked some NRARead More sponsored meetings and this was the sample of speakers:attendees joined in honoring Friends of NRA Volunteers of the Year from across with country. Attendees also listened to speakers from the event's sponsors Cabela's, U.S. Law Shield and Universal Coin and Bullion. Former NRA President David Keene encouraged NRA members to stand and fight for their American freedoms, and R. Lee Ermy "The Gunny" reinforced the message by surprising guests and autographing a Glock pistol for one winner. Now unless "the gunny" was the invited person who spoke on behalf of gun control, I cant find the parrallel you demand be accomodated for this groups agenda.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!