.
Feedback

Rob Does the Job for New Canaan Republicans [Update Video]

After a long, tough campaign battle, Rob Mallozzi beats out Paul Giusti for the Republican nomination for New Canaan's First Selectman.

The wait for the of the Republican caucus seemed longer than the campaign itself. After the polls closed at 8:30 on Tuesday night at Saxe Middle School, the candidates, their families and supporters, anxiously awaited the final tally. 

At 12:16 a.m. on Wednesday, moderator Dennis Taylor made the announcement most had come for. 

"In the race for First Selectman, Giusti 907 votes, Mallozzi 1,313." 

And with that, the hotly-contested race for the Republican nomination for First Selectman was over. 

"I'm extremely happy with the outcome," Mallozzi said. "I've been around this town for a long time, people know me, I didn't have to advertise myself. I've been Selectman for the last four years. People knew my management style and I really appreciate that they voted for me." 

Mallozzi beat Giusti by a strong margin of 406 votes. It marked the second time in four years that the owner of has won a campaign against Giusti. In 2007, Mallozi earned the Selectman's position over Giusti. 

"It's unfortunate that in campaigns, there has to be a winner and a loser," Giusti said. "I thought I ran a good, honest campaign that really focused on the issues. I want to congratulate Rob and thank my supporters who worked incredibly hard." 

The battle for the Republican nomination for Selectman was not much of a contest. Nick Williams, chairman of the Board of Education, came through with a big win over John Engel 1,324 to 755. 

"As my wife said, 'it's Christmas in July,' Williams said. "I am truly humbled that the voters voted me in. This is a terrific town, one of the best in the country. John [Engel] ran a great campaign. It was a tough race and I'm thankful that I won." 

Locking down the four spots for Town Council were candidates who New Canaan is quite familiar with. Stephen Karl (1,538), Tucker Murphy (1,439) and Kenneth Campbell (1,005) all earned the right to be on the November ballot as endorsed Republican candidates.

E. Roger Williams (1,006) also won the right to be on the ballot as a party-endorsed candidate.

"I'm very thankful," Williams, who is currently the New Canaan Fire Commissioner, said. "I'm honored to represent this party. This campaign brought out a lot of issues that need to be addressed."

There will be no change at the position of Town Clerk. Claudia Weber, who has held the job since 1998, edged Jennifer Purdy in a tight race 1,120-947. 

As history shows, whoever wins this caucus, usually wins the general election in the fall, which will be held on November 8.

(Editor's Note: This article has been changed from the original version to reflect the fact that candidates for the Town Council did not win seats on the council, but rather won the right to be on the November ballot as Republican party-endorsed candidates. Patch thanks reader David Kostek for bringing this to our attention.)

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

CTgal111 July 20, 2011 at 11:49 am
CONGRATULATIONS ROB!! you won it faire and square and were a class act the whole way. New Canaan you are in excellent hands! Cheers.....
Four Jacks July 20, 2011 at 11:55 am
So HAPPY that Rob won!
Serenity Now! July 20, 2011 at 12:38 pm
The majority (59%vs 41%) have clearly spoken about the future of New Canaan. Good luck Rob. You earned it.
MPM July 20, 2011 at 12:59 pm
I logged on earlier and there were several comments in addition to those above. Where did they go and why were they deleted? I thought they were constructive and supportive.
CTgal111 July 20, 2011 at 01:12 pm
@ Billy Mason:
What unsportsmanlike behavior!! Perhaps this is why your opponent lost?
heavens sake July 20, 2011 at 01:14 pm
The voters of New Canaan have spoken and emphatically have stated they want New Canaan back on track
Matt Stichnoth July 20, 2011 at 02:31 pm
You're right. It is a fool's pursuit.
SCC July 20, 2011 at 03:14 pm
Elmcrest:
Nope. I didn't say anything at all about why Steve Karl won, but I'd guess that his role as a local merchant worked to his benefit as well.
Elmcrest July 20, 2011 at 03:19 pm
Thanks for the clarification. Enjoy your summer.
SCC July 20, 2011 at 03:20 pm
Matt:
I'm not off-message because I'm not trying to sell a message. I was merely making an observation.
Bruce Pauley July 20, 2011 at 03:21 pm
After such a heated contest, it is probably very normal for some people to try and reason why one person lost and another won, when really it is very basic. More people feeling strongly that Rob was the right choice came out and cast their vote, than those who supported Paul. That is not to say that these are two very engaging people; they both have a vision for New Canaan and they are both good people. It simply means that Rob will probably be our new first selectman and Paul will continue to support New Canaan and help to keep it the great town that it is. I am sure that they will find common ground where they will work together. I think all of us would do well to join them in all their future efforts, and try very hard to shed any party based, personal based, and/or social based prejudices and just do our individual parts, in a constructive manner, to keep New Canaan on the right path. It's time to just let it go.
suzanne jonker July 20, 2011 at 04:14 pm
Congratulations Rob! It was my pleasure to work on your campaign. People know who you are and your intentions are only for the best for New Canaan.
It also didn't hurt that our committee was comprised of a very diverse group of residents. Good luck, I know you'll do a great job, and please let's come together as a party.
John Sheffield July 20, 2011 at 04:43 pm
Congrats to Rob and his supporters. I must also say good job to Paul's supporters and his campaign as well, as they were tough, disciplined and persistent.
We disagreed on many issues and had healthy debate on them. This forum (and others) tried also to keep the candidates and their supporters in check on facts and statements. Sometimes we disagreed substantially (and sometimes angrily), but most often those debates were based on facts. Each side may also see the same facts through a different lens or from a different perspective/interpretation. It's been fun, frustrating at times, but in the end when we are each challenged to support the statements we make here (or anywhere), it causes each of us to ensure our statements are in fact supportable. Thanks to those who have read my comments here----I've received many compliments and I thank you for that. I received some expressions not as flattering, and that's helpful too. Speaking out forces one to learn about what one is saying, and I have certainly learned a tremendous amount about our town govt in this process and have become an educated citizen/voter. And ultimately, isn't that a desired outcome---in fact, requirement---of a democracy?? Thank you.
David Kostek July 20, 2011 at 05:03 pm
An important detail: "Stephen Karl (1,538), Tucker Murphy (1,439) and Kenneth Campbell (1,005) were all re-elected to the council. E. Roger Williams (1,006) will fill the position vacated by Paul Foley, who chose not to run again."
Actually, no one won a seat on the Town Council last night. They won the Republican party's endorsements to appear on the ballot as nominated Republicans. Now, I grant that is is EXTREMELY unlikely that any of those endorsed by the GOP last night would somehow lose out in November. But, a Republican could force a primary, for example, and ultimately end up on the ballot instead of one of the four who won endorsements last night. If the Democratic party nominated four candidates as well, voters could elect three of each. Or, voters could elect a Green party candidate (hey, you never know!) or someone running on another party line. Again, these scenarios are all very unlikely in New Canaan, I know. But it is imprecise to say anyone "won" a position in town government last night.
Sheryl Shaker July 20, 2011 at 05:18 pm
David Kostek: Thank you for pointing out the difference. The article has been changed to reflect that Town Council candidates were not re-elected to the council, but won the Republican party's endorsement for the November ballot.
Lauren Cerretani July 20, 2011 at 05:47 pm
I agree with Bruce Pauley. Time to unite and move forward for the sake of our town.
Jane Himmel July 20, 2011 at 07:21 pm
In that same vein, to correct heavens sake: The Republican voters of New Canaan have spoken!
And, I agree with SCC: I don't know how anyone can say "what" the voters have spoken about. Rob beat Paul in 2007; now he beat him again. What did the voters "speak" about last time?
heavens sake July 20, 2011 at 08:09 pm
Sorry for error. Should have read "Selectman candidate ". As far as issues, countless Patch comments have expressed differences which for many Republican voters formed basis for voting decisions in primary and is purpose for a free press. Must admit though candidates themselves tend to pars their words to attract most voters or even worse do not address issues. Also many endorsement letters to press are "good guy and good gal" statements. Nevertheless, this primary had many issues Republican ,Democrat and Independant voters were made aware of because Town issues recieved wide and extended press coverage and no doubt reason for large turnout. I believe actual Town vote will likewise be large for same reason.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Really, why even have a tab called "news"' it's all fluff for the mat part.
Four Jacks June 7, 2013 at 03:49 pm
Most part.
Elmcrest June 7, 2013 at 11:50 pm
Well, Patch does have this going for it: hundreds of semi-literate spam phishing posts per hourRead More about televised international soccer matches from multiple fake posters. Hundreds! Reading Patch is like walking through the ruins of a once thriving metropolis.