Vaccine Mandate Strips Doctors of Power to Choose

It was in embedded in the 600 pages proposals that were sprung on legislators at the very last moment.


Dear Editor,

I think we can all agree immunizations are important to protecting the health and well being of our children. However, a recently passed vaccine mandate effectively strips pediatricians of the power to choose where they obtain their vaccines. 

It was in embedded in the 600 pages proposals that were sprung on legislators at the very last moment. Doctors are crying foul. There were no public hearings for lawmakers to evaluate the pediatrician’s thoughts, parental input and insurance company input. This has me concerned. 

By January 1, 2013 all health care providers who administer vaccines to children must receive their vaccines solely from the Department of Public Health.

Currently, vaccines are provided to children through three methods including:

  1. Pediatricians purchase vaccines in the marketplace and insurance companies reimburse the cost.
  2. Children who are uninsured or underinsured or are covered by Medicaid can receive free vaccines through the federal Vaccines for Children program.
  3. Connecticut has a program funded by insurance suppliers to provide additional vaccines to children.

Last year, the Childhood Immunization Task Force was established and tasked with considering whether our state should continue universal childhood immunizations. It was also required to do the following:

  • develop a plan to maintain children’s access to quality immunizations
  • determine how to respond to new federal recommendations for immunizations not currently provided by the DPH
  • allow doctors to select vaccines and have the DPH provide them
  • determine how best to cover these associated costs

According to the task force’s report, there must be further study of the vaccine mandate.

It states that “given the complexity of the issues the task force addressed, as well as the importance of achieving the highest possible rate of childhood immunization in a cost-effective manner, a successor task force or similar body should continue to evaluate and monitor” several issues, including “the conditions and implications of requiring mandatory provider participation in the state childhood immunization program.”

I agree.

Glen K Dunbar July 21, 2012 at 11:04 AM
Not tthat I understand this. BUT, when it comes to Children, Oldies and people in general I feel Drs should be able to get their medicine from wherever they feel it is in the best interest of their customer/patient. Moreover, the insurance Companies need to just "zip it" and do their job which is pay ALL of our medical bills. The Govt needs to "bud out" too (Politely speaking) GLEN
Peggy July 21, 2012 at 02:00 PM
Just another peice of Obamacare BS
Duke July 21, 2012 at 08:12 PM
This is a state mandate. It has nothing to do with the Federal government
joe July 21, 2012 at 11:31 PM
another example of "big" government infringing on our health. I trust my dr. more than some clerk who worked at dmv. vote republican. small government
Peggy July 22, 2012 at 08:01 AM
ooooppsss, my mistake, I had gotten so wrapped up in the Obamacare debacle that I was thinking just something else snuck into the Health care act. Wouldn't be surprised if it was in there also. Thank you for correcting me. But as far as I am concerned leave my choice of Health Care alone.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »