.
Feedback

Video: Himes Speaks on House Floor About Tragedy in Newtown

Guns "were designed with the explicit purpose of killing as many people as rapidly as possible," according to the congressman.

 

U.S. Rep. Jim Himes, D-Conn., 4th District, spoke on the House floor Monday about the attacks at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

"I looked at the photographs of the parents at those funerals and tried to imagine the bottomless grief, the anger, the questions they must have, and of course, that is impossible," he said. "At the very front of those questions is the question of why, something we will all struggle with individually..." 

"We are entrusted by our constituents with one thing, which is to ensure that this does not happen again."  

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

concerned citizen December 18, 2012 at 01:00 pm
It has to start with looking at our mental health system and changing laws that prevent families from getting the help they need for their sons. Lets face it.. It is men committing these crimes. We need to help them before this happens again.
concerned citizen December 18, 2012 at 02:20 pm
Panic buttons in main office and in in every classroom should be installed to not only sound school lockdown alarm but alert police immediately. And I am not sure if principal should have gun in office for self defense. On fence about that. This can't happen again.
Erich Bruhn December 18, 2012 at 05:21 pm
Hopefully this recent tragidy has finally awakened us to the need for change. I feel we need to revisit our laws and support activities in three main areas. The mental health side, the societal side with the proliferation of violence in games, TV, and movies and the access to guns. Put these three together and we have the mass shootings these past years. We should also research other countries who's citizens own guns, but do not experience similar acts of violence. Canada and Australia come to mind. Both had incidents in their pasts which resulted in new or changed laws. Both have experienced dramatic improvement. Also upsetting is the emotional speeches from our politicians these days. Where have they been these last two, four, eight, ten years? Where are their bills? Why are past bills locked up in committee? We passed a law restricting assault weapons in 1994 only to let it die in 2004? Why? We all know why! I find most of these political speeches more than a bit hypocritical. One thing we can all do is contact our Representatives and tell them, enough talk, we want to see some action! This time we will not forget what they do or how they vote. I'm not suggesting we alter the Constitution, but we need to make some adjustments to our laws to accommodate our current society. Make you voice heard!
Hector Medina December 18, 2012 at 06:30 pm
For ONCE a politician gets it right:
". . . a country that has raised violence to a secular religion . . . " THIS is the issue. The US is a violence-worshipping society. In every aspect of its social and economic life violence is rewarded. If you look for a job, recruiters are looking for "aggressive" candidates. If you are a salesman, it is "salesmanship" to sell a junk car for good money. If you are a banker, you are rewarded with golden pensions / retirements for erasing the lifelong savings of your customers. We pay huge fees and salaries to actors and actresses that depict pure violence on screens. We pay inordinate amounts of money, collectively, for violent video-games. We admire those that "make it to the top" for being greedy, ambitious and . . . violent. Perhaps not in a physical way, but there is violence in pushing everyone aside to get "to the top". ¿And Sports? Ha! There is violence in our foreign policy where we let thousands die in Africa, but commit to regional wars in the Middle East. There is violence in our political campaign ads that do more than tell the facts. They are aimed at destroying the moral standing of the opponent. There is violence in the stridency of our marketing industry. And we reward all that. We reward violence. Don't expect the politicians to legislate on such subjects. Start with the person in the mirror. Analyze EVERY action YOU take and start reducing the violence in YOUR life. ONLY way to change.
Alison Mark December 20, 2012 at 12:31 am
Mental health awareness and support must be more seriously addressed by this country. Adam Lanza's mother attempted to manage his illness but she was not equipped. We have not yet heard that mental health professionals worked with the son even though he was diagnosed as a child. In addition, of course, is the issue of easy access to semi-automatic weapons. Why does the law allow semi-automatic weapons to be legally purchased in the U.S.? What is the benefit?
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!