.
Feedback

Healthier Lunches Will be Part of Back to School This Year

New federal rules will require more fruits, vegetables, along with calorie limits.

 

As kids head back to school this week they’ll see more than just new books and teachers in their classrooms. For the first time, they’ll be seeing healthier, hot lunches.

Under rules that take affect this year in federally-subsidized public school lunch programs, the federal government is for the first time imposing calorie and sodium limits on school lunch offerings and requiring schools to offer students more fruits, vegetables and whole grains.

The new rules, established by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, represent the first changes in public school lunch programs in 15 years. The calorie and sodium limits imposed under the new guidelines are based on a student’s age.

The changes are part of the Healthy, Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 and are part of an overall effort to make federally subsidized school hot lunches healthier for kids and help reduce a growing obesity problem in the country.

The new requirements include:

  • Age-appropriate calorie limits and portion sizes;
  • Larger servings of vegetables and fruits (students must take at least one serving of produce with their school lunch)
  • A wider variety of vegetables, including dark green and red/orange vegetables and legumes
  • Fat-free or 1 percent milk (flavored milk must be fat-free)
  • Reduced sodium content

Officials with the School Nutrition Association of Connecticut said they applaud the federal school lunch changes, but added that some districts in Connecticut were already trying to make their lunches healthier before the new rules were passed.

“While these standards will be seen in schools nationwide for the first time this fall, many Connecticut school districts have already begun these efforts,” said Susan Maffe, President of SNACT. “We continue to proactively work to offer additional opportunities for healthier and nutritious lunches and are committed to ensuring a higher quality of nutritional standards than ever before as well as empowering students to make a healthier change.”

Paul M Potenza August 28, 2012 at 10:34 am
I have always wondered why kids are taught about nutrition at school but then are offered junk at lunch. This seems like a good idea. I wonder if kids will circumvent this in practice, however. Lose the French fries!
Dr Leonaura Rhodes August 28, 2012 at 02:08 pm
Great steps towards healthier food! I think they might be missing the point on flavored milk though, it's the sugar and artificial coloring (most are banned in Europe) in flavored milk that are bad, not the fat. In fact from a calcium intake point of view 2% milk is optimal. Let's hope they keep on making progress in the right direction. Let's just hope they aren't counting pizza topping as a vegetable!
Glen K Dunbar August 28, 2012 at 04:55 pm
What wonderful strides. I hope my Kelly will enjoy the new menu
NCHammer August 28, 2012 at 07:34 pm
Maybe people need only to look back 60 years ago for the answer to obesity and good nutrition. Obesity and current day diseases were rare then. Many people today constantly eat empty calories to the point of obesity because their bodies are asking for nutrients it needs, but NEVER gets from artificial depleted “light” empty food. Food 60 years ago was consumed as was with natural nutrients. What might be the answer foods? Fats with nutrients (whole or 2% milk, natural beef, whole eggs, etc.); minerals/vitamins (real maple syrup, farm vegetables, pure cane brown sugar, etc.); sea salt (no weight gain and is a must for mineral absorption and body function). The list goes on, but the answer may be simple; consume food in the form that it was eaten in 60 years ago, not stripped or altered of the natural needed nutrients, and obesity/disease just might fade away on its own………(deep fried foods – 2 are in the picture above - and artificial sweeteners/ingredients should be avoided)
NCHammer August 29, 2012 at 03:43 am
1940s school lunch menu....
http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/cph.3f05427/?co=wpapos
Matt September 11, 2012 at 02:26 am
But now here in lies the stupidity attached to any federal regulation...children MUST take the serving of produce, whether they like it or not, and then throw it in the trash if they don't want it...good lesson to teach them...be wasteful. If they don't take the produce serving then they are charged a higher rate (a la carte pricing) for the remainder of their lunch. Of course the free and reduced lunch kids will not be penalized...only the kids of the parents who work hard for the money they spend on lunch. What a crock of #@&%!!!!
Canaanite September 11, 2012 at 05:21 pm
My child eats lunch in school, and the menu is appalling . . . Hot dogs (contain nitrates which are proven carcinogens), chicken patties and chicken fingers (full of fat and sodium and preservatives), canned soup and fruit (cans are all lined with BPA, an unhealthy, hormone disrupting chemical that doctors warn we all should stay far away from), crackers (contain too much sodium and often high fructose corn syrup) - too many carbs and not enough fresh fruit. Almost everything is processed. I don't have the option of sending lunch in either . . . Processed food will always leave one feeling unfulfilled and craving something more . . . They are all injected with artificial flavors that are designed to keep you craving more (anyone see 60 minutes this last Sunday??) . . . Even COLD CUTS are extruded and flavor is REINJECTED into them. (This info is from a reliable source who has firsthand information on the subject.) NOT REAL FOOD! What children are fed in school is nothing short of a complete disgrace. Every school should have a team of cooks to cook decent food for everyone . . . even if it costs a bit more. One cup of homemade, nutritious soup (dirt cheap to make) is worth more than a chicken patty sandwich with wilted lettuce and canned peas and canned soup. And french fries (fried, baked, whatever) should be altogether BANNED. Won't kill a kid to learn to like a baked potato instead . . .
Canaanite September 11, 2012 at 05:24 pm
Someone mentioned pizza topping maybe being counted as a vegetable . . . Somewhere I heard that they count KETCHUP as a vegetable in some places . . . no idea if that is true or not but if it is, it's truly mindblowing and appalling. Condiments full of sugar and fat (like ketchup and mayonnaise) shouldn't even be available. They are akin to soda, nutrionally void and nothing but sugar.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!