.
Feedback

Mental Illness Need Not Be Stigmatized

At least one in 5 people suffer from mental illness. It is a disease of the brain. There is no reason to stigmatize, nor suffer needlessly. Treatments are extremely effective.

May is Mental Health Awareness Month and as with other designated months, the laudable goal is to educate and raise awareness – and there is good reason.

According to the U.S. Surgeon General, at least one in five people have a diagnosable mental illness in a given year. The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) reports that serious psychological distress, such as major depression, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, borderline personality disorder and post traumatic stress disorder affected 24 million adults over the age of 18 in 2007.

The good news is that treatments for mental illnesses are highly effective. In fact, the National Alliance on Mental Illness (NAMI) reports that with adequate treatment, 70 – 90 percent of seriously mentally ill individuals will have a significant reduction in symptoms and a greatly improved quality of life.

The bad news is that according to the National Institute of Mental Health, barely more than half the people in need of treatment ever get it: Why is that – why do nearly half the people who need treatment go without it? There are many parts to the answer.

One barrier to seeking treatment is the stigma of acknowledging mental illness in oneself, a family member or friend. Myths about mental illness are still common – that the affected person is weak, has a character flaw, is not trying hard enough, is "giving in."  Not surprisingly, acknowledging a mental illness often brings a sense of shame or failure, and with it a reluctance to seek treatment. This is tragic, not only for the ill person but to our national economy. It is estimated that the cost of untreated mental illness is more than 100 billion dollars each year.

Another barrier is individual expense. Health insurance coverage for mental illness is often insufficient for adequate treatment and out-of-pocket expenses can be daunting. Recently enacted Congressional legislation mandating some degree of parity with other illnesses has helped considerably – but not nearly enough. 

However, I suspect many people don’t seek treatment because they find the prospect of mental illness terrifying. We avoid facing mental illness in ourselves or others in every way we can. The very name of this month – Mental Health Awareness Month – is an example. We tell ourselves it is about mental health when it really is about mental illness. When someone has a heart attack we don't say he/she has a heart health problem. When someone is dealing with a cancer we don't say he/she has a cell health problem. Indeed, in the not-too-distant past "cancer" was a term to be avoided at all costs – doctors didn't tell their patients and patients who knew their diagnosis didn't tell their families or friends. 

Effective treatments for cancer and other diseases have helped greatly in easing the stigma of illnesses. Effective treatments for mental illnesses have not eased the stigma because of the way we perceive ourselves. Mental illnesses affect our thoughts, feelings, memories and our sense of self-awareness – in other words our sense of who we are, what we know of ourselves, our very being. The fact that thoughts, feelings and consciousness are all brain functions and can be affected by diseases of the brain, the fact that the brain in one sense is just another organ that can malfunction, is lost on us. It is lost on us for the very reason that these malfunctions are a threat right to the core of who we are, our knowledge of ourselves and our sense of control over ourselves.  

Two important ways to further decrease these stigma-related problems are public education and the ease that comes with familiarity. Education comes with disseminating advances in mental illness research and treatment and with the many courageous people who continue to come forward to share their own experiences with illness.

The ease that comes with familiarity is something that each of us can work on. It is often very clear when someone is depressed or has a thinking problem. It is often very clear that someone has trouble behaving in socially conventional way, evidently because of some form of illness. In these situations we tend to avoid interacting with someone who, after all, may seem strange and perhaps frightening.

But think of this: Inside that strange being is a person – a person who is more like you than different from you, with hopes and fears similar to yours, who may be struggling but who is also aware of being shunned, a person with his or her own humanity. 

If you know the person you might try saying hello, or smiling or acknowledging him or her in some way. You might ask how they are doing. You might, in other words, treat them as a person. With some simple generosity of spirit on your part you may soon have this unexpected benefit -- that mental illness doesn't seem so frightening anymore. With the comfort that comes with familiarity you may be helping yourself as well as someone else and may be contributing your small part to diminishing the stigma and fear still associated with mental illness.

 

        –  Sig

 

We look forward to your comments on this and all Silver Hill Hospital posts. 

Silver Hill Hospital’s blog is intended only to provide information; it is not intended to provide diagnosis or treatment. If this is an emergency, please call 911.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from New Canaan Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Thomas Paine June 18, 2013 at 01:46 pm
Why is it the panel for this event does not include a single advocate for gun-owners' rights? WithRead More all due respect to Chief McNamara, why does the panel no include a person who can speak to gun safety from a gun-owning civilian's perspective? ML, you claim that the assembled folks "do not offer judgements about gun ownership" but they are not including a single voice that can offer perspective on gun ownership. I have been to "education" sessions sponsored by Meg's March for Change and they are one-sided indoctrinations into gun control advocacy. >>>> I was in Hartford for the public hearings in January when both Meg and March co-founder Nancy gave their personal testimonies and they all but threatened the legislators on the panel with election day retribution for all those who did not tow the gun-control line of thinking (i.e. March and CAGV). To suggest that Meg "does not offer judgements" if fallacious at best, disingenuous at worst.
Porter Gladstone III June 19, 2013 at 06:27 pm
I guess people can organize discussions with agenda as they see fit? Just checked some NRARead More sponsored meetings and this was the sample of speakers:attendees joined in honoring Friends of NRA Volunteers of the Year from across with country. Attendees also listened to speakers from the event's sponsors Cabela's, U.S. Law Shield and Universal Coin and Bullion. Former NRA President David Keene encouraged NRA members to stand and fight for their American freedoms, and R. Lee Ermy "The Gunny" reinforced the message by surprising guests and autographing a Glock pistol for one winner. Now unless "the gunny" was the invited person who spoke on behalf of gun control, I cant find the parrallel you demand be accomodated for this groups agenda.
Penny Riordan June 10, 2013 at 01:00 pm
Sorry Elmcrest! We don't like the spam either! As Lisa said, our engineers are working hard toRead More prevent those spammers from attacking our 900+ sites across the country.
Elmcrest June 11, 2013 at 07:45 am
Good luck! Just today, Tuesday, June 11, there have been over 350 of those spam posts since 3:30 AM,Read More and it’s not even 8:00 AM yet!
Ed Smith June 13, 2013 at 12:02 pm
Yup, "US Open Golf" is doing it right now, posting a new blog every 2 minutes.
Diane McEvoy June 18, 2013 at 09:48 am
US Representative Larson is now on board, which leaves Rep. DeLauro and Senator Murphy. Neither ofRead More their staffers are forthcoming about why they have not co-sponsored. Please call their DC offices and urge them to stop up. Murphy has supposedly received only 40 calls on the subject.
monique thomas June 7, 2013 at 05:14 pm
Unknown to most parents, children’s data is being shared beyond the school district with sixRead More agencies inside the Utah Data Alliance and UTREX, according to Utah Technology Director John Brandt. The student data is further being “mashed” with federal databases, according to federal Education Dept. Chief of Staff Joanne Weiss: http://blogs.edweek.org/edweek/inside-school-research/2012/07/ed_urges_states_to_make_data_s.html While John Brandt assures us that only a handful of people in Utah have access to the personally identifiable data of children, recent alterations to federal FERPA (Famly Education Rights Privacy Act) regulations which were made by the U.S. Dept of Education, have radically redefined terms and widened the window of groups who can access private data without parental consent. For more on that, see the lawsuit against the U.S. Dept of Education on the subject: http://epic.org/apa/ferpa/default.html But first, an interjection: I want to introduce this article: http://seattleducation2010.wordpress.com/2013/01/02/your-students-privacy/ I like this article because it exposes the facts plainly, that parents are unaware that their children’s information is being shared without parental permission, beyond the school, beyond the district, and even beyond the state. It is verifiable and true. What it means: Courses taken, grades earned, every demographic piece of information, including family names and income, is being watched by the U.S. government via schools. Verify for yourself: The U.S. Dept. of Education’s own explanation is here, showing why SLDS systems exist: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/slds/factsheet.html
Tasin Sumaia June 9, 2013 at 01:55 pm
http://directwatchliveonline.blogspot.com/2013/06/watch-france-vs-brazil-livestream-online.html
1CarGarageinNC June 6, 2013 at 06:16 pm
Why does ANY of this surprise you? You can take the man out of Chicago... Where is the outrageRead More across the land? Why do we sheepishly respond to these multiple malfeasances? Obama will stay in office and do what he wants until 2016 for one reason. Two words. President Biden.
Glen K Dunbar June 7, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I have and always will respect whoever our Pres was/is and will be. Is one person over the otherRead More really going to change my life?? NOPE. I am still going to be spinning my wheels in poverty. As for IRS> I think IRS should be closed too. Nobody wants to pay taxes. Why can't the Govt just print more money Problem solved!! Also, USA needs to stop wasting money overseas and take care of our own...like my bail out
Marie-Pierre Graf June 5, 2013 at 04:55 pm
I feel so blessed to have had those 37 great young people in my life for the last 3 years! I willRead More miss them so much!